CITY OF KANKAKEE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

AUGUST 21, 2006        7:00 P.M.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       I’d like to call the meeting to order, please.  I’d like to ask Pastor Daniel Morris from the First Church of God to come up and open our meeting with a prayer.

 

PASTOR MORRIS:    Shall we pray?  God of our fathers, we echo the words of the Psalmist of old who said, Oh, that men would give thanks to the Lord for His goodness and for His wonderful works to the children of men!  And, we do pause in this moment to thank You, O God, for Your bountiful blessings upon this nation, upon this state and upon this City of Kankakee.  America is great because the leaders of the land have trusted in Your divine guidance and leaned not to their own understanding.  May it be so tonight.  As the chosen leaders of this City gather during this hour to deliberate and do business, may they see the providential hand of God at work in their midst.  May their minds be clear, may their hearts be pure and their work beneficial for the people of Kankakee.  In the name of Christ, Our Lord, we pray.  Amen.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Now I’d like to ask Beau Thomas, Jordan and Morgan Thomas to come up and lead our...........open our meeting with the pledge.

 

BEAU, JORDAN AND MORGAN THOMAS AND ALL:     Pledge of Allegiance.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Thank you very much.  Roll call.

 

CLERK DUMAS:

PRESENT:   Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)         

            ABSENT:  Brown (1)

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Department Heads.

 

CLERK DUMAS: 

PRESENT: Kinkade; Young; Dear; Spice; Bohlen; Power;  Simms; Tyson; Cross; Nolan; Gordon (11)

            ABSENT: Leshen; Fuerst (2)

 

MAYOR GREEN:       You have........you have the, ah, minutes of the August 7, 2006, meeting.  I need a motion to approve.

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         Are there any questions on the contents therein? Any questions?   Move to approve as recorded.

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           Second.

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hunter, seconded by Alderman Hearn to approve the minutes of the August 7, 2006, meeting.  All in favor, AYE.  Opposed, same sign. 

 

MOTION TO APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 7, 2006

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  First item of business under Petitions.  We have an Ordinance approving an annexation agreement between the City of Kankakee and Don and Gail Anderson to annex approximately 6.75 acres into the City.  First of all, we need to accept the recommendations of the Planning Board.

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I make a motion to, ah, accept the recommendations of the Planning Board.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant to accept the recommendation of the Planning Board.  Roll call.

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PB06-09: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN ANNEXATION AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF KANKAKEE AND DON AND GAIL ANDERSON

TO ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 6.75 ACRES INTO THE CITY

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, we have the Ordinance approving the annexation agreement between the City of Kankakee and Don and Gail Anderson.  Is there a motion to Suspend the Rules?

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I make a motion to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with the passage of this Ordinance at this time.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with the passage of this Ordinance.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Is there a motion to put this Ordinance on its Final Passage and Pass? 

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I so move.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant to put this Ordinance on its Final Passage and Pass.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

PB06-09: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN ANNEXATION AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF KANKAKEE AND DON AND GAIL ANDERSON

TO ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 6.75 ACRES INTO THE CITY

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, we have the Ordinance approving a petition for annexation by Don and Gail Anderson to annex approximately 6.75 acres into the City.  We need to accept the recommendations of the Planning Board.

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I make a motion to accept the recommendations of the Planning Board.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant to accept the recommendations of the Planning Board.   Roll call.

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PB06-09A: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PETITION FOR ANNEXATION

OF THE  DON AND GAIL ANDERSON PROPERTY INTO THE CITY

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, is the Ordinance approving the annexation for Don and Gail Anderson of this property into the City.  Is there a motion to Suspend the Rules?

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I make a motion to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with the passage of this Ordinance at this time.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with the passage of this Ordinance.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Is there a motion to put this Ordinance on its Final Passage and Pass?

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I so move.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant.  Any questions?  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

PB06-09A: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PETITION FOR ANNEXATION

OF THE  DON AND GAIL ANDERSON PROPERTY INTO THE CITY

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, is case PB06-11.  It’s a request for final plat approval for the Riverstone Commercial Park, 3rd Addition Subdivision development.  We need to accept the recommendations of the Planning Board.

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I make a motion to accept the recommendations of the Planning Board.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant to accept the recommendations of the Planning Board.  Any questions?  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman (12)

            NAY: Cox (1)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

 

PB096-11: A REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF THE RIVERSTONE

COMMERCIAL PARK, 3RD ADDITION SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, is the request for final plat approval of the Riverstone Commercial Park, 3rd Addition, Subdivision development.  Is there a motion?

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I make a motion to accept the request of final plat approval.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant to request.............to grant the request for final plat approval.  Any questions?  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman (12)

            NAY: Cox (1)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

PB096-11: A REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF THE RIVERSTONE

COMMERCIAL PARK, 3RD ADDITION SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  That’s the end of the Petitions from the Chair.  We’re going to move to Communications.  Before I ask for any action on the Communications, there’s a couple things that I would like to mention tonight.  Number one is, I passed out to you a press release that went out today statewide showing that Kankakee, Illinois, has been picked as a place where an ethanol plant is going to be built.  That plant will be in the Kankakee Regional Industrial Park south of this community.  It will be right next door to where the landfill has been sited.  This company, Alternative Energy Solutions–or Sources, has purchased 248 acres to build a plant at this location.  It will produce about 110,000,000 gallons of ethanol per year.  We’ll use about, ah, 35,000,000 bushels of corn from Kankakee County.  It will employ somewhere between 45 to 55 people and have an annual payroll of $2.5 to $3.5 million a year.  One of the reasons that this location was picked by this company, it is next to the landfill, but one of the sources of energy that will be used eventually in this plant, of course, is the methane gas that’s produced by this facility.  As you will recall, this is one of the things that the administration was talking about.  There are things that can occur and can happen and can be positive as a result of a landfill being sited in this County.  So, that’s for your information only.  Ah, I think it’s a heck of a..........I think it bodes well for this community and when you think of what’s happened south of town, ah, and I think it’s even part of this press release, you know, IKO Roofing has just located here and built a $40,000,000 plant and that plant is up and running and, as a matter of fact, I think the official ribbon cutting of that is next week.  Ah, and, Cognis Corporation, of course, just completed a $19,000,000 expansion south of town.  So, there are good things happening in this community and that’s important to us. 

 

ALDERMAN WILLIAMS:     Mayor Green.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Alderman Williams.

 

ALDERMAN WILLIAMS:     Does Tom Volini have anything to do with this?  Is he partner’s with it or any way?

 

MAYOR GREEN:       No.  No.  He sold the land to this company out of Kansas City. 

 

ALDERMAN COX:    Mayor Green.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Yes, Alderman.

 

ALDERMAN COX:    That asphalt plant.  How many employees they got?

 

MAYOR GREEN:       What asphalt plant? 

 

ALDERMAN COX:    The one that..........

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Roofing.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Oh, the roofing?  You know, I can’t answer that question.  I think–and please don’t hold me to this–I think it’s somewhere between 65 to 85 employees.

 

ALDERMAN COX:    Ah, they got fair employment?

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Pardon?

 

ALDERMAN COX:    Fair employment?

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Ah, I’m assuming they do.  I mean, I’ve...........

 

ALDERMAN COX:    Mr. Gordon, is fair employment at that plant?

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          They’re not in the City.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       They’re.......they’re........at the present time, you’ve got to recall, they’re in the County of Kankakee, not in the City of Kankakee.  They come in at the end of the five-year period, so we have no jurisdiction over them right at this time. 

 

ALDERMAN COX:    What is it, 25 employees or more?

 

MAYOR GREEN:       I can’t answer that question.

 

ALDERMAN COX:    Mr. Bohlen, do you know?  EEOC

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          EEOC, yes.

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         Fifteen.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Fifteen or more.  You’re right.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Ah, next, I just want to announce that this question came up at one of the meetings about a month ago.  Ah, and, I said that I would take it under advisement.  I have.  I’m going to appoint a committee to look at the compensation of the Mayor, the City Clerk and the Aldermen for the City of Kankakee.  I have done that.  I have appointed a committee to do that.  I have appointed two elected officials from this Board; one being Dennis Baron, the Chairman of the Budget Committee.  The other being Steven Hunter, the Vice-Chair of the Budget Committee.  The following individuals I have appointed and they have all accepted their committee appointments.  By the way, this doesn’t take any action on the part of the Council, but I just wanted to advise you of what I have done.  I have asked Mr. Bill Buck who is from Centrue Bank and he has agreed to serve on that committee.  I’ve asked Ken Munjoy who is the Circulation Manager for The Daily Journal.  He has agreed to be on that committee.  I’ve asked Jamie Boyd a local attorney who has agreed to be on that committee.  I’ve asked Jeff Jones a local businessman, an undertaker, in the community who will be on it.  I’ve asked John Cloman.  John is sitting in the back and John is representing many of the neighborhood groups in our community.  I asked Phil Kambic the current CEO of Riverside Hospital and I’ve asked Pam Dunlap who is the PR person for Peoples Bank.  And, those folks have all agreed to it.  I’m going to be the Chair of that committee.  That will meet probably some time after Labor Day and we will come back to you with some recommendation.  Next, at the Utility Board meeting tonight I also announced that I was appointing a committee to look at the rates that the, ah, solid..........that the sewer rates for the City of Kankakee.  They have not changed in the last two years.  We did a study six years ago to look at that.  The committee is going to be made up of myself, of Mr. Brown–Mr. Carl Brown, and Mr. Ken Hearn and Mr. Simms and we are going to come back to that Board with some type of a recommendation.  Last, and, of course, not least of all, I also gave each of you an invite from the Provena St. Mary’s Hospital.   As you know, George Miller is leaving that institution to move to Ohio, and they’re having a reception for him on Thursday night of this week from 5:30 to 7:00 (P.M.).  They asked that I would ask each of you as Aldermen for the City of Kankakee if you’d like, you certainly can attend that reception.  I think it’s a shame that we’re losing Mr. Miller from our community.  I think he has been a very dynamic leader in our community and certainly has been a good leader for Provena Hospital.  So, those are the end of the things that I had that were not on the agenda and they’re just announcements from the Chair.  We’ll go into Communications and we can deal with–under Communications–A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H if you so desire.

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         Ah, items A, B, C are received and placed on file, but I move to approve items 7D, E, F, G and H.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Is there a second?

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         I’ll second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hunter, seconded by Alderman Epstein.  All in favor, AYE.  Opposed, same sign. 

 

GLEANER’S IS REQUESTING PERMISSION TO BLOCK OFF THE 500 BLOCK

OF SOUTH WILDWOOD AVENUE FOR A BLOCK PARTY/CARNIVAL TO

BE HELD AT STEUBEN SCHOOL ON SATURDAY, AUGUST 26, 2006, FROM

9:30 A.M. UNTIL 6:00 P.M.

 

KIWANIS CLUB OF KANKAKEE IS REQUESTING PERMISSION TO HOLD

THEIR ANNUAL PEANUT SALES DAY ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2006,

FROM 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 6:00 P.M.

 

CENTRAL ILLINOIS CARDINALS CHEERLEADERS ARE REQUESTING

PERMISSION TO HOLD A TAG DAY ON SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2006

 

GROW IN ILLINOIS IS REQUESTING PERMISSION TO HOLD THEIR

ANNUAL TAG DAY ON SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, FROM

9:00 A.M. UNTIL 1:00 P.M.

 

RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT THE ROUTE FOR THE KANKAKEE

PARADE ON SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2006

 

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, we’ll move into Committees.  Standing Committees.  Public Safety.  Alderman Hunter.  Any comments?

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         Mayor Green, Your Honor.  This report is self-explanatory.  They should be received and placed on file.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Thank you.  Budget.  Alderman Baron.

 

ALDERMAN BARON:           Your Honor, the only item we’re requesting action on is the permission from the City Council to let for bid certain fire safety equipment that’s been identified by our Fire Chief for qualifying a grant from the IPRA which has been explained to us was $50,500 for the things that qualify.  We have a list of what looks like it would be about that much.  And, we’re just asking for permission to let for bid this certain fire safety equipment.  I would so move.

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Baron, seconded by Alderman Hunter.  Any questions?  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO GO

OUT FOR BID FOR FIRE SAFETY EQUIPMENT IDENTIFIED AS

QUALIFYING FOR IPRA GRANT REIMBURSEMENT

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, License and Franchise. 

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         Information is in the packet.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Thank you.  Ah, by the way, and something just slipped my mind under Communications.  Ah, I do want to announce tonight that I received a resignation from Carl Dodson.  Carl has been our Building Maintenance Department Head now for how many years, Carl?

 

CARL DODSON:       Four years.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Four?  Four years.  Carl has received an opportunity to go to work for the U.S. Government through the Department of State in the same field he has been in here with the City of Kankakee.  He submitted his resignation to me last week and that will be effective the end of this month.  I wrote a letter back to Carl accepting it with regret.  I’m sorry that he’s leaving our employ and our community, but I think it’s a heck of an opportunity for him.  This is something I think he’s been working for for some time.  I can tell you that it’s been two years ago when–about two years ago–when I interviewed with the Department of State when they were starting to work on Carl and his background.  So, I congratulate him.  I wish him the best of luck for he and his family, but I think it’s one.......one heck of an opportunity for him.  So, I just want to say at this time, Carl, you know, thank you for everything you have done and we appreciate it.  And, I, and the citizens of Kankakee, as well as the elected officials, wish you nothing but the best of luck in the future. 

 

ALDERMAN COX:    Mayor.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Alderman.

ALDERMAN COX:    Concernin’the financial crisis, are you gonna’ replace him?

 

MAYOR GREEN:       I don’t know yet.  I haven’t decided yet.

 

ALDERMAN COX:    Gotta’ start cuttin’ back.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       I haven’t decided yet.  Next, the Report of Officers.

 

ALDERMAN WILLIAMS:     Move to approve the Report of Officers, place the money in the proper accounts, pay the bills in the amount of $458,685.09.

 

ALDERMAN CIACCIO:        Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Williams, seconded by Alderman Ciaccio to approve the Report of Officers, pay the bills, place the money in the proper accounts in the amount of $458,685.09.  Questions on any of the bills? 

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         We have the money to, ah, issue the checks?

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Yes.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

REPORT OF OFFICERS APPROVAL OF BILLS $458,685.09

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, under Unfinished Business, we have the Ordinance for the Appropriation Ordinance for the City of Kankakee.  And, this is the Second Reading.  Is there a motion?

 

ALDERMAN BARON:           I would move that we place the Appropriation Ordinance, the budget, on Second Reading and pass.

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         I’ll second that.  And, this budget is balanced, I assume?

 

MAYOR GREEN:       That’s correct.  Motion by Alderman Baron, seconded by Alderman Hunter.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman (12)

            NAY: Cox (1)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

ORDINANCE MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR CORPORATE PURPOSES

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING MAY 1, 2006 AND ENDING APRIL 30, 2007

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  New Business.  We have an Ordinance declaring Surplus Property Ordinance for the City.  Is there a motion to Suspend the Rules?

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         Motion to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with consideration and passage of this Ordinance at this time. 

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hunter.  Is there a second?

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Second by Alderman Grant to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with the passage of this Ordinance.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox  (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Is there a motion to put this Ordinance on its Final Passage and Pass?

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         I so move.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hunter, seconded by Alderman Grant.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

ORDINANCE DECLARING CERTAIN PROPERTY SURPLUS OF THE

CITY OF KANKAKEE–KANKAKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND

AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, is the handicapped parking at 993 S. Fourth Avenue.  Is there a motion to Suspend the Rules?

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           Motion to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with the passage of the Ordinance at this time.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with the passage of this Ordinance.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Is there a motion to put this Ordinance on its Final Passage and Pass? 

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I so move.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 32, SECTION 231, ESTABLISHING

HANDICAPPED PARKING AT 993 SOUTH FOURTH AVENUE

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, is an Ordinance naming a public street to be commonly known as College Drive.  This is the street from River Road that goes up to KCC.  This arose as a result of receiving 9-1-1 calls and the college decided they’d sort of like to call it College Drive, but we had not officially done it yet, so we need to do that and name it so dispatch has the right name on the street.

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I make a motion to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with the passage of this Ordinance at this time.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, seconded by Alderman Grant to Suspend the Rules that would interfere with the passage of this Ordinance.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; (There’s a lot of action in the 4th Ward tonight, huh?

            ALDERMAN HEARN:            Yes, there is.

ALDERMAN HUNTER: Lot of action.); Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (I think the street should be named Lehnus) (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Is there a motion to put this Ordinance on its Final Passage and Pass? 

 

ALDERMAN HEARN:           I so move.

 

ALDERMAN GRANT:           Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Hearn, second by Alderman Grant.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen (I’d like to ask, does this include the street that goes in front of the ice rink, too?

MAYOR GREEN:    No, this is only the street going up to the college at the present time.  Is that not right, Cliff?

CLIFF CROSS: Well, no, the actual map of that shows that coming up all the way around.  I can amend it if you want.  But, it does run through.  I’d probably make more sense.

            MAYOR GREEN:        Okay.

ALDERMAN HUNTER:   To where?  Where does it stop?

            CLIFF CROSS:           It’s basically a U.

MAYOR GREEN:        It goes back to River Road. 

CLIFF CROSS            Around back to River Road.  Everything there.........

MAYOR GREEN:        Excuse me.  Go ahead, Cliff.

CLIFF CROSS:      Everything there is currently addressed off  River Road.  But, it doesn’t make more sense because it’s way off of River Road.  It does make more sense to have it go completely through, that way you can have indistinguishable.

MAYOR GREEN:        Mr. Tyson, you have a comment?

DAVID TYSON:       The only thing I was going to add to that, I think that the reason for this Ordinance is to connect the ice arena road which is already dedicated to the.......to the City of Kankakee to the entrance road to the college and this will eventually make a total U around from in front of the college going adjacent to the ice arena. 

MAYOR GREEN:        So, it’ll all be know as College Avenue, correct?

            DAVID TYSON:          Yes.

            MAYOR GREEN:        College Drive, excuse me.); Trost; Jones (Mayor, does that change the address of the college to College Drive instead of River Road?

MAYOR GREEN:        I can’t answer that question.

            UNKNOWN:     Yes.  100 College Drive.

MAYOR GREEN:        It’s 100 College Drive for the college now.

ALDERMAN JONES:             Okay.); Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)   

 

ORDINANCE NAMING A PUBLIC STREET TO BE COMMONLY KNOWN

AS COLLEGE DRIVE

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Next, is an Ordinance amending parking in front of the post office and establishing handicapped parking.  I spoke with the post master one day and now that the mail boxes are no longer on Court Street and because there were so many people parking there and then going across the street to the courthouse, ah, it became a problem providing parking for individuals who wanted to go in and use the post office.  So, I had Mr. Tyson take a look at that.  His recommendation is that we create 15-minute parking in front of the post office and that the first spot on Harrison Avenue on the west side of the street be designated handicapped because that’s where the ramp is there.  The post office has created two other handicapped spots on the west side of their building.  So, that’s the reason for this Ordinance tonight.  So, I need a motion to Suspend the Rules. Actually we could probably deal with both D and E at the same time. 

 

ALDERMAN COX:    So moved.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Cox  to Suspend the Rules on D and E.  Is there a second?

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         I’ll second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Second by Alderman Epstein.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.  Is there a motion to put this Ordinance–these Ordinances on Final Passage and Pass? 

 

ALDERMAN COX:    So moved, Mayor.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion by Alderman Cox.  Is there a second?

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         Second.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Second by Alderman Epstein.  Roll call. 

 

CLERK DUMAS:

AYE:  Hunter; Epstein; Baron; Ciaccio; Williams; Grant; Hearn; Diersen; Trost; Jones; Schwade; Coleman; Cox (13)

            ABSENT: Brown (1)

 

ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 32 SECTION 32-180 ESTABLISHING

FIVE (5) FIFTEEN-MINUTE PARKING SPACES AT 475 EAST COURT STREET

 

 

 

ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 32 SECTION 231 ESTABLISHING A

HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGN AT 475 EAST COURT STREET ON THE

WEST SIDE OF HARRISON AVENUE

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Motion carries.   Next, you received from us a copy of the revised supplemental host agreement for the operation of the landfill.  I’d like to go through that with you and then ask for approval on that tonight.  I’m going to ask Mr. Bohlen and/or Mr. Simms just to walk through it as to what changes we have made to it and then ask for your vote. 

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Essentially, the changes are.........deal with terms of the length and amount of solid waste and the amount of money to be paid for the solid waste.  In concept, it is the plan of the developers at Town & Country to go ahead and proceed on with the construction of the landfill on a very minimal basis at this point.  The reason is, there are still two lawsuits pending.  One, before the Illinois Supreme Court and one before the Illinois Appellate Court of the 3rd District.  The one before the Illinois Supreme Court deals with the first application which the City Council approved in which the Appellate Court said that the City Council was correct in approving and upheld the City Council’s position although the Pollution Control Board had reversed the City’s–reversed the approval.  That issue is before the Illinois Supreme Court at this time.  The second case is before the 3rd District Appellate Court which is your approval of the second application which the Pollution Control Board approved the City Council’s approval of the second application and the County has appealed that.  In order to facilitate dealing with local waste, Town & Country has proposed to commence construction and to, on a very limited–not on a limited basis–to allow the transfer, the hauling of solid waste from municipalities within the County until such time as the litigation is resolved.  They are permitted to do this under the Illinois EPA permit.  Because we’re limiting, by agreement, to simply municipal waste from  municipalities in the County, there is not much income to be derived from that by Town & Country and we’ve agreed, at a fixed price which is currently $5.00 a ton less than what we’re paying the transfer station in Momence, that we will be allowed to haul and...........our municipal waste to that......to that location as soon as it’s open.  The projected open date is–do you know Richard?

 

RICHARD SIMMS:    Six to eight months. 

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Right.  In the meantime, there were certain other issues of the host agreement that we had discussions regarding.  Those are included in the supplemental agreement which are there.  One of those provides–if I can go through it with you–if you go into the Whereas in Paragraph 2, the first set of............the first paragraph is the Whereas is that the......... we’re attempting to include in the host agreement.  The first is–the first Whereas under Paragraph 1 says that the operator will commence operation despite the pendency of the siting appeals and serve the residents of Kankakee, Bradley, Bourbonnais, Aroma Park, Manteno and Momence.  Second Whereas, is that he is going to develop.....the company will obtain a permit and develop a compost site for the purposes of receiving the City’s yard waste and as a facility for the reloading of curbside recycling materials for further processing.  So, at this site, he has agreed to locate a compost site for our yard waste which is currently being hauled to the western edge of the County and he’s agreed to locate a..........essentially a transfer station for the recycling materials that are now being hauled to Bradley. 

 

ALDERMAN SCHWADE:     Attorney Bohlen.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Yes.

 

ALDERMAN SCHWADE:     Is it.........that’s just the City’s yard waste though, not the other communities?

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          That’s correct.  That’s correct.  The third Whereas is, he has agreed to increase the amount once he is open for business on a full-scale basis–  meaning not just limited to the municipal waste of the County, but open on a full-scale basis.  As you recall in the Host Agreement, there was free tipping for the City for a certain amount.  It was capped at 250,000 tons–or $250,000 worth.  We’re getting....we doubled that by agreement to $500,000.  Again, that’s just for the City. 

 

ALDERMAN COX:    I thought it was supposed to be all the housing.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          And, that’s the next sentence down which we increase the construction and demolition waste that the City could haul from 15,000 cubic yards per year to 25,000 cubic yards per year.  We’re currently at about 15, I think.  So, this gives us some amount extra that we’ll be able to haul.  The third.........

 

ALDERMAN COX:    How many houses is that?

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          I have no idea how many houses.  It depends on how big the houses are I suppose.  I don’t know.

 

ALDERMAN COX:    I knew that’d be your answer.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          The next is the commitment that was made to the Central School District of 10¢ per ton–that’s now–that had never been included within the agreement.  It’s now within the agreement.  Ah, the next goes on to the duration of the agreement, Paragraph 2.  It states that the duration of the agreement will be extended during any term of months that the facility is open only for the receipt of waste from municipalities.  The reason that is, is we don’t want the limit on the income to be inclusive of the time period that that’s going to happen.  We don’t know how long we’re going to be...........he’s going to be limited to that.......to that extent.  So, it’s extended.  This is free time, in essence, for the City other than the fact that we’re paying the cost.  This Paragraph 3 talks about the yard waste composting facility and the facility for trans-loading the curbside recycling.  Paragraph 4 provides that the City shall have inspectional respon........... or, permits us and requires us to have our own construction inspection of the ongoing construction of this facility.  And, we will have primary responsibility for inspection of construction and facility operation.  That’s to assure that the City can be involved and insure the quality of that construction and operation.  The next provision deals with the requirement of roads.  The improvement of roads which was previously in there, ah, and I’m not sure–I can’t remember what the change is.  However.

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         Is there still a commitment to do, ah, Otto Road as well as..........

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          There’s a commitment to do Otto Road assuming the landfill is sited.  Quite frankly, your previous announcement that you saw tonight will require the County to improve Otto Road before we ever get there.  Because, in order to accommodate the ethanol plant, Otto Road’s going to have to have substantial improvements. 

 

MAYOR GREEN:       And, I’m sure the County will want to do that.

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         Oh, I’m sure they will.  I’m sure they will.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Ah, Paragraph 5 increases the amount of tonnage which can be hauled to the facility from 3,500 to 5,500.  I should have brought the Host Agreement in.  Paragraph 6, Richard can you–do you remember what that deals with?

 

RICHARD SIMMS:    Tell me what it is.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Paragraph 6.5 shall be modified to delete the term .037.

 

RICHARD SIMMS:    Yes, that’s the.......the, ah, Ordinance at the time you sited the landfill. 

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Okay.  Thank you.

 

RICHARD SIMMS:    Leachate was 3.5¢ a gallon and we indicated it’s now 5¢ based on the Ordinance so he had to have met.......

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          We’re raising the price that he will pay to the City for us treating the leachate from the...........

 

RICHARD SIMMS:    The leachate from the landfill.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          From the facility.

 

RICHARD SIMMS:    Correct.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          So, that will be more revenue, again, to the City.  Paragraph 7 says that we will pay the $34.00 per ton and increases the amount that we’re able to haul.  Paragraph 8, ah, provides for the term, the amount in time.  In addition, in Paragraph 8, that’s where the 10¢ per ton for Central School District is, and it’s also provided that if there is revenues or the landfill receives in excess of 3,500 tons exclusive of waste generated by the City, that the tipping fee to the City will be increased by 75¢ per ton for that amount in excess of 3,500 tons.  The tipping fee is now $4.00.  It would go to $4.75 for that amount over 3,500 tons.  Ah, Paragraph 9 deals with what it means when we’re going........when the money starts flowing which is the second full year of operation.  The second full year of operation is a reference to the point at which he starts to receive waste from outside the four, or the five cities mentioned in the County of Kankakee.  Paragraph 10 is a limit on his right to sell the property.  Or, to sell the ownership interest.  In the event that it’s sold to a publicly traded company, we have the right to renegotiate our agreement with the new buyer.

 

ALDERMAN HUNTER:         Good .  Excellent.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Ah, Paragraph 11 deals with the residential property protection plan and that’s suspended until such time as the siting approval is obtained as a result of the Illinois Supreme Court decision or the 3rd District Appellate Court decision.  Paragraph 12, ah, references the host fees and the City revenues and that’s simply modified to reflect what we’ve already discussed.  And, I believe that’s the primary.......those are the changes.  In essence, there’s three major changes.  One is, it’s going to open early until he can get final siting approval.  The second is, the tonnage, the daily tonnage is increased, but so is the amount of money to the City and third, the amount of waste that the City can haul for free is increased both in terms of actual solid municipal waste and construction debris. 

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Alderman Jones.

 

ALDERMAN JONES:             Ah, you said this is still in court. 

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          It is. 

 

ALDERMAN JONES:             Well, how are they going..........in the utility meeting, we were told about the Starlight was getting hit because they’re saying it’s a compost and it’s not a compost.  And, here we’re going to open up a compost when it’s still in court and I don’t understand.  Explain that to me.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          We are not........WE are not opening up anything.  He.....Town & Country will receive a permit from the Illinois EPA to establish and operate a composting site and will be subject to EPA inspections and regulations.

 

ALDERMAN JONES:             So they don’t have a permit as of yet?

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          No, but they’ve agreed to obtain it and it’s.....it........the answer is, to your question is no, but that’s a.......we believe that that’s not going to be a problem. 

 

ALDERMAN JONES:             So, we’re voting on something that they don’t even have yet?

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          We’re voting on making modifications to an agreement which require them to obtain the permit.  So, we’re not voting on something they don’t have yet.  We’re voting on an agreement which imposes requirements on the City and on the developers of the landfill.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Alderman Cox.

 

ALDERMAN COX:    In case the decision don’t go the City’s way or Town & Country, will we be liable to........could those indistinguishable sue the City?

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          No.  Well, anybody can sue anybody for anything.  To answer your question.  But, do I believe there is any liability on the City?  The City is not the operator.  The City is not the.........the City has no liability in the construction of or the operation of that facility.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Alderman Espstein.

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         Is it my understanding, then, that they do not need siting approval as long as they do not accept out-of-County waste?

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          No, they do not need..........well, the answer is they have all the approval they need right now unless one of the court decisions or both of the court decisions go against them.  At that point, then they’re going to have to go back and refigure where they are.  The likelihood........the dilemma that the............that the  courts have in this case is, the County is on two exactly opposite arguments.  If they prevail in the Illinois Supreme Court on their primary argument, then they would have to lose in the 3rd District Appellate Court on that same argument  which is, the argument is in the Illinois Supreme Court that the Appellate Court should have given deference to what the Pollution Control did in reviewing the case.  And, since they didn’t, that therefore the Appellate Court’s decision approving the siting should be reversed.  However, in Town & Country Two........

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         That’s the opposite.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          That’s the opposite.  If they give deference to the Pollution Control Board’s decision, then the County’s argument just cannot prevail.

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         So, we’re not concerned that we will have a landfill that is started, but may end up going nowhere?

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          There is always..........any time things are in court, there’s always concerns, but it’s not our concern.  It’s ultimately the developer who has to make provisions, then what happens for closedown at that.......if he would make that decision. 

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         If.......and is there a reason for limiting the acceptance of just this municipality’s waste and not accepting out-of-County at this point?

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Because of the risk and cost of construction for the developer, the developers are willing to take the risk.......

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         Minimally.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Minimal risk and establish this, in essence, to accommodate the five municipalities that are listed.  Ah, as an accommodation since nobody else in the County government seems to care what happens to that garbage. 

 

ALDERMAN EPSTEIN:         Okay.  Thank you. 

 

MAYOR GREEN:       Alderman Ciaccio.

 

ALDERMAN CIACCIO:        Ah, this is an awful lot to throw at us at one meeting.  We haven’t.......I don’t see nothin’ that he was talkin’ about in writing.  I make a motion we Table this ‘til the next meeting.

 

ATTORNEY BOHLEN:          Alderman, it is in writing.  It was in your book that was sent out Friday.

 

MAYOR GREEN:       It was in your book.