VISIONING QUESTIONNAIRE – 2030
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Q-1. Do you agree or disagree:
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
(If you agree or strongly agree, describe the character).
Q-2. What brought you to
|
a. Small town. |
e. Employment |
|
b. Spacious lots. |
f. Location within metro |
|
c. Family connections. |
g. Other (explain): _________________________ |
|
d. Affordable housing. |
h. Other (explain): _________________________ |
Q-3. How large of a city (physically, in terms of
size) should
|
a. The city should not annex anymore. |
d. The city should annex extensively. |
|
b. Only small additions are appropriate. |
e. Other (explain): _____________________________________ |
|
c. The city should annex modestly. |
|
Q-4.
|
a. The city should not grow any larger in
population size. |
d. 35,001 to 40,000 |
|
b. 25,000 to 30,000 |
e. 40,001 to 50,000 |
|
c. 30,001 to 35,000 |
f. Larger than 50,000 |
Q-5. Regarding the effects of racial and ethnic diversity
of the population in
|
a. Diversity makes for a more interesting
city. |
d. Minorities contribute positively to
society. |
|
b. Minorities contribute significant
investment of dollars and taxes. |
e. Other (explain): _____________________________________ |
|
c. Minorities provide a labor supply needed
for jobs in the area. |
f. None of the above. |
Q-6. Which of the following characteristics or
descriptions do you believe should be included in the overall vision for the City
of
|
Possible
Elements of the Citywide Vision |
Agree
– Include
|
Disagree
– Exclude |
|
Part of
the metro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historic
district(s) |
|
|
|
Railroad
theme |
|
|
|
Small
town feel |
|
|
|
Homogeneous,
low density, predominantly detached housing |
|
|
|
A good
place to raise a family |
|
|
|
Residential
neighborhoods protected from land use change |
|
|
|
Senior-friendly |
|
|
|
A
strong and vibrant town center |
|
|
|
Mixed
use development in downtown and business corridors |
|
|
|
Heights
of buildings that have a low-rise feel (1-
stories (<50’) |
|
|
|
Building
heights in select places 4-8 stories (mid-rise) (<120’) |
|
|
|
More
“urban” feel with urban building heights (high-rise) (120’+) |
|
|
|
Revitalization
and redevelopment of Court Street and other places as appropriate |
|
|
|
Housing
affordable for households of all incomes |
|
|
|
Annexation
of master-planned subdivisions and additional lands |
|
|
|
Safe
and pleasant environment for walking |
|
|
|
Auto
dealerships, auto repair, and highway businesses along state highways |
|
|
|
Big-box
stores (Wal-Mart, Lowes, Staples, etc.) |
|
|
|
Stores
one can walk to from neighborhoods |
|
|
|
Industrial
and manufacturing |
|
|
|
Corporate
headquarters and office/business parks |
|
|
|
Balanced
economic base |
|
|
|
A good
place to do business |
|
|
|
Possible
Elements of the Citywide Vision |
Agree
– Include
|
Disagree
– Exclude |
|
Active
parks (e.g., ball fields and community centers) |
|
|
|
Passive
greenspace (e.g., multi-use greenway trails) |
|
|
Q-7. Which of the following character areas should
be proposed/retained:
|
Proposed
Character Area |
Summary
Description |
Agree |
Disagree
|
|
Historic
|
Small,
compact area corresponding with the City’s downtown, predominantly new
urbanism/ mixed use |
|
|
|
Suburban
Residential |
Predominantly
single-family, detached dwellings at low densities (less than units per acre), set back from curvilinear streets and cul-de-sacs. |
|
|
|
Traditional
Neighborhoods |
Primarily
single-family residences built close to streets designed in a rectangular or
square block, lot, and street pattern (connected grid pattern) and densities
in the range of 4.5 to 6 dwelling units per acre. |
|
|
|
Suburban
Neighborhoods |
This
character area corresponds with conventional suburban subdivisions with larger
lots (1/2 acre or more) that have, and lots are spacious. Streets are built
to a relatively wide standard when compared with traditional
neighborhoods. Connectivity is not
necessarily provided, although an objective of this character area is to
provide for pedestrian activity and connections among subdivisions to provide
more of a true “neighborhood.” |
|
|
|
Urban
Communities |
Urban
density residential developments in the City (apartment complexes and
condominium and townhouse projects).
Densities range from 6 to 10 units per acre and more. |
|
|
|
Area
Targeted for Community Development |
Areas
that may have issues of housing maintenance and/or are eligible for community
development block grants, targeted housing programs, neighborhood self-help
programs, and other revitalization activities |
|
|
|
Planned
unit development |
Areas
that are planned as communities and built in phases, usually with cluster housing
& open space |
|
|
|
Proposed
Character Area |
Summary
Description |
Agree |
Disagree
|
|
Institutional/
Campus |
Large
institutional campuses such as public school sites and includes large
churches |
|
|
|
Office-Institutional
Corridor |
A
corridor targeted predominantly characterized by churches and institutions,
and served by appropriate pedestrian access (Primarily Located Near Kankakee
Community College) |
|
|
|
Employment/ Industrial |
Industrial
parks, manufacturing, warehousing and wholesale and business parks where
truck traffic is dominant. |
|
|
|
Community
|
Predominantly
commercial and service functions, predominantly automobile-oriented but which
are also pedestrian friendly |
|
|
|
Court
Street Highway Corridor |
A
corridor targeted for revitalization with new pedestrian-friendly commercial
and mixed uses with improved aesthetics through quality redevelopment |
|
|
|
Interchange
Redevelopment Area |
An area
surrounding the interchange of Court Street and Interstate 57 with new
development of multiple-story office/commercial/mixed use buildings |
|
|
|
Conservation |
Lands
that are or should be set aside for greenspace, or which will have very
limited low-density residential use |
|
|
|
[Other
Name] ____________ |
Describe:
________________________________ ________________________________________ |
|
|
|
[Other
Name] ____________ |
Describe:
________________________________ ________________________________________ |
|
|
Q-8. Kankakee should consider a policy of
promoting housing for people with mixed incomes in the same development or
neighborhood, as one opportunity for promoting more affordable housing in the
city. (circle
one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-9. The city’s plan should articulate specific
revitalization and redevelopment (and redevelopment financing) strategies for
the Court Street and any designated redevelopment area. (circle one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-10. Current measures to protect trees from land
development and cutting are adequate. (circle one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-11. Specific measures are needed to maintain and
enhance the City’s tree canopy (versus a focus simply on trees). (circle one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-12. Some segments of the city’s population are
inadequately served by existing public facilities and services, and the plan
needs to identify and address those inadequacies. (circle one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-13. Certain geographic areas of the city are
inadequately served by existing public facilities and services, the plan needs
to identify and address those inadequacies. (circle one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-14. There are
opportunities to promote greater utilization of the
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-15. The city’s plan should provide for additional
public transit service. (check one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-16. The transportation plan should emphasize
improvements to sidewalks and bicycle routes to provide alternative travel
options, versus projects emphasizing automobile traffic. (check one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-17
. Traffic “calming” projects (e. g,
speed humps, speed tables, etc.), and “no-truck” routes need to be considered
in some places to slow and limit traffic. (check one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
Q-18. Specific policies and regulatory measures are needed to address concerns
about residential infill development in residential neighborhoods.
Definition of Infill:
Development that occurs on vacant, skipped-over, bypassed, or underused
lots in otherwise built-up sites or areas. (check one)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |